![]() |
Nigeria,
Africa’s most populous country with 180 million people, and its largest
economy with a US$1.1 trillion GDP, is imploding: Insurrections by Boko
Haram and others; sectarian butchery where the country’s Muslim north
meets its Christian south; corruption so rampant it ranks as the
country’s second-largest industry; and plummeting oil
production are making the country ungovernable.
This resource-rich former British colony
— until recently Africa’s largest oil exporter — is now racking up
deficits, and negotiating multi-billion dollar bailouts through agencies
such as the World Bank.
But bailouts from rich countries won’t
cure Nigeria’s dysfunctions. This immense country is artificial, a
forced union of three major and hundreds of minor ethnic groups speaking
different languages, observing different legal codes and loyal to
different tribal groups.
Nigeria’s cure will start when the historical boundary cavalierly drawn on a map by Britain’s colonial masters dissolves.
The more coherent constituent nations to emerge — composed largely of
the Igbo in the southeast, the Yoruba in the southwest and the Hausa and
Fulani in the north — would be less burdened by the many rivalries that
now hobble the central government, and better positioned to govern
themselves.
"Nigeria doesn’t need bailouts; it needs to change its governance."
A first attempt at that necessary
dissolution occurred in 1967, seven years after Britain gave Nigeria its
independence, when the Igbo and related tribes of its oil-producing
southeast broke away to form the Republic of Biafra. This nascent black
African Christian republic, with a population of 14 million in an area
larger than Ireland, was soon officially recognized by other black
nations in Africa as well as Haiti in North America, and was
unofficially supported by France, Spain, Norway, Israel and other
Western nations, along with the Vatican and various Catholic
organizations such as U.S. Catholic Relief Services. Biafrans, who had a
culture of village democracy, tended to be skilled, entrepreneurial,
relatively prosperous and relatively literate. The Republic of Biafra
had the international legitimacy, the human capital and the resource
wealth to be viable.
But the support that came from its
sympathizers was almost entirely moral, forcing Biafra and its initial
3,000-man army to manufacture most of its own arms in a civil war
against the Nigerian army, which was armed by the United Kingdom and the
Soviet Union. Some two to three million perished in the two-and-a-half
years that Biafrans held out against their better armed, more numerous
enemy, before surrendering and reintegrating into Nigeria.
Nigeria since the Biafran War saw waves
of military coups and repression. It stayed intact only because its oil
revenues enabled the central government to finance its military and to
buy off rebel insurgents. With oil revenues down, the central government
reduced the payouts to tens of thousands of militants by 70 per cent,
leading to widespread upset. In recent weeks, a new pro-Biafran militant
group demanding sovereignty, the Niger Delta Avengers (NDA), has
attacked the country’s oil infrastructure, almost halving Nigeria’s oil
production to 1.4 million barrels a day. “Our goal is to cripple
Nigeria’s economy,” NDA vowed, and it is making good on its vow. Among
its successes: blowing up two Chevron export terminals and an
underwater pipeline that forced Royal Dutch Shell to shut a terminal
handling 250,000 barrels of oil a day.
The Nigerian military not only needs to
contain popular unrest in the Biafra region — the local press reports 53
killed in a “Biafra bloodbath” on Monday during a march commemorating
the anniversary of Biafran independence — it also needs to contend with
Boko Haram, which aims to establish a caliphate in the Muslim
north-east. But Nigerian forces are dispirited and ineffectual, short of
ammunition, poorly trained and poorly paid.
Even if World Bank financing comes
through, the loans won’t do much for an economy in shambles. The
national currency has depreciated 70 per cent in the last year, leading
to high inflation; government workers in 26 of the country’s 36 states
haven’t received their monthly salary for months; and severe gasoline
shortages led the government to end price controls, causing a 67 per
cent hike in prices at the pump.
Nigeria doesn’t need cash; it needs good
governance, which is likelier to occur if the Igbo rule themselves in
the southeast, the Yoruba in the southwest and the Hausa and Fulani in
the north. The West blew it a half-century ago when the Igbos attempted
to achieve self-determination by establishing the Republic of Biafra. We
may soon see a reprise of that civil war. How the West responds will
determine whether the nation states within Nigeria achieve
self-determination, or whether Nigeria, like Libya and Somalia, becomes
another failed state.
Lawrence Solomon is a policy analyst with Probe International. He can be reached by email HERE. This article first appeared on Financial Post.
*************************************
Opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not represent the opinions of KARIFEST or other authors.
0 Comment to "OPINION: OIL-RICH NIGERIA ON THE BRINK OF IMPLOSION AND THERE'S ONLY ONE WAY OUT BY LAWRENCE SOLOMON"
Post a Comment