Independent
National Electoral Commission (INEC) Chairman Prof. Mahmood Yakubu,
yesterday explained why many of the elections conducted since he came on
board are inconclusive.
According to him, it is because elections are getting better and votes are being made to count.
He added that the do-or-die mentality of
politicians has compounded the issue because elections are now tightly
fought, with slim margins of victory, unlike in the past when elections
were won with landslide margins.
He explained to The Nation that because of the tight
results, cancellation of votes from polling units matter in determining
who the winner would be and make elections inconclusive on the first
ballot.
Mahmood said INEC had discovered that
all instances of inconclusive elections were in areas where political
players perpetrated violence and made the environment hazardous for the
Commission’s staff and innocent voters.
He said in areas where elections were
concluded on the first ballot, the Commission had no record of violence
by political actors.
The INEC Chairman spoke in Lagos yesterday at a meeting with media executives.
He said: “There has been a revolution in
our elections since 2015, particularly with the introduction of
technology, but we haven’t come to grips with this reality. Elsewhere,
it is normal to have this kind of (inconclusive) election. It is a
requirement in democracy that votes must count, and people must
ultimately determine who the winner is.”
Yakubu noted that Nigeria’s electoral
law envisages that elections may be inconclusive, even in a presidential
contest. But he added that the current provision of the law is
impracticable if that happens. “If a presidential election turns out
inconclusive, it is envisaged under the Constitution. But it is near
impossible to conduct a supplementary election between the two leading
candidates within seven days as provided for by the law. As we speak, we
have 120,000 polling units in Nigeria, spread nationwide. We have to
print the ballot paper, deliver the ballots to all the states and all
the polling units, and mobilise the staff to conduct the elections. It
is impossible to do that within seven days. Thank God it has never
happened. But the fact is that it is envisaged under the law, and that
means it may actually happen,” he said.
He considered it curious that INEC is
being accused of dereliction of some sort because of the recent spate of
inconclusive elections. “In the discussions that I have listened to and
what I have read so far, I have not heard anyone accuse the Commission
of declaring elections inconclusive outside the provisions of the law –
especially Sections 26 and 53 of the Electoral Act.
“That is the
context that we should put the inconclusive elections. In 2011, the
governorship election in Imo State was inconclusive because of votes
outstanding in four local governments. In 2015, we had inconclusive
elections again in Imo, Abia and Taraba states. The results were
declared after supplementary elections were conducted. In-between 2011
and 2015, we had an inconclusive election in 2013 in Anambra State. So,
this trend is backed up both by legal provisions and our experience.


0 Comment to "INEC CHAIR: THE REASON ELECTIONS ARE INCONCLUSIVE"
Post a Comment